Error evaluation number of working days without time bookings
in progress
C
Christopher Arzt
In the Employees tab, the time period (including productivity) is evaluated.
Among other things, we use this to determine on a monthly basis whether employees have forgotten to record their working time on individual days (column number of working days without time bookings).
It has happened to an employee that the number is marked with 1, but the employee actually has 3 days on which he has not recorded any working time.
Arne Semmler
marked this post as
in progress
S
Sandra Oheim
Yes, that's right Arne, there are only a few (I haven't recognized the pattern yet).
Arne Semmler
Christopher Arzt - we were unable to reproduce the case on test data. Can you please check whether the effect is still there or has been corrected in the meantime? If not, please let me know again here, then we will have to make an appointment to look at your data together. Thank you! Arne
C
Christopher Arzt
Arne Semmler - We've now been able to identify the bug. On 2 out of 3 days, the working time was not posted to a project, but the working time was recorded as a break. This shows that no working time was recorded on these 2 days, which is theoretically true in these cases. However, these days are not included in the calculation, as at least the break was recorded on this day.
In fact, no working time was recorded on the remaining day.
Arne Semmler
Christopher Arzt Thank you for the investigation - that's how I was able to reproduce the behavior! So would you expect that days on which, for example, I recorded coming and going and a break of one hour but did not distribute my attendance time to services through individual time bookings (and therefore decimated my AZ account) would also be counted?
C
Christopher Arzt
Arne Semmler: I think it is the logical conclusion for the evaluation that this case is also presented. If you display the days, they are also displayed, but they are not counted. It's a bit confusing if you don't know.
S
Sandra Oheim
Addition: There is still an error in this evaluation; it also shows employees who have been “inactive” (no longer in the company) for a long time.
Arne Semmler
Sandra Oheim: Hi Sandra! I can't reproduce the case - I suspect that you are not showing all inactive employees either, but only a few - there may be another reason for this that we need to find out. Is my guess correct that not all inactive ones are shown, but only a few?