PLEASE only offer “coming as a duty” in addition, instead of making an unsolicited change “coming and going as a duty” and presenting the person present with a fait accompli
Benedikt Voigt
so that we understand the background:
Do you want Projo to automatically derive “go” from “coming” and entering working hours?
To save the hassle of typing?
Or are there any other reasons?
N
Nathalie Unger
Benedikt Voigt we don't want to have to make a statement about when someone is leaving. Just like it was two weeks ago. As a freelancer (and also the one who pays for the costs projos), the workplace is constantly shifting; there is no going/completing working day in this sense. MA also lengthen their breaks (this is not always stated in detail), since the time of walking says very little about what was achieved during the day. Request from management: Please change as it was before. Only time of arrival is useful for us to inquire
Benedikt Voigt
Nathalie Unger: Thanks for the quick answer.
As a freelancer/freelancer, you probably shouldn't even have to record coming
And walking just as little.
To do this, we are planning to be able to turn it off for freelancers (or other individuals).
Would that help you?
And about permanent employees: So you don't want to force and evaluate breaks?
N
Nathalie Unger
Benedikt Voigt should “come” be mandatory for everyone (even freelancers, that doesn't bother), just “going” is not interested, leads to additional work.
For MA, we require that pause be entered; it does not necessarily have to be set as a mandatory entry. Therefore, walking is not always correct (if employees have forgotten to enter their break after all)